SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Zoltan! who wrote (7521)10/6/1998 3:32:00 PM
From: Borzou Daragahi  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
This is the same Reno, by the way, who authorized Starr's expansion of the Whitewater investigation into sexual matters. Do you really believe anyone one of those rabid, foaming-at-the-mouth Repuiblicans lusting after Clnton's throat in Congress would hold back if they had or knew of actual evidence proving that Clinton was guilty of such treason? If there is solid evidence of such crimes anywhere, it would leak out. Unless, and this is the only reason other reason I can think of that it hasn't been brandished by the Republicans, the same reason you haven't heard much about filegate from the GOP: they're probably all guilty of similar stuff.

If Clinton is in fact guilty of knowingly accepting donations from a foreign country, let him hang. Don't just impeach him, jail him, as they should have jailed Tricky Dick. Funny that it's not among the articles of impeachment, however. I'll betcha five (virtual) bucks that the issue won't go anywhere: 1) because it's gonna be hard as heck to establish his knowing such a thing in a court of law and 2) the Republicans as well Democrats have likely all accepted such monies in the past.