SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : The Justa & Lars Honors Bob Brinker Investment Club -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Justa Werkenstiff who wrote (1491)10/8/1998 7:17:00 PM
From: DD™  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 15132
 
Just to Play Devils Advocate..

TA Guru was right again..

taguru.com

DD



To: Justa Werkenstiff who wrote (1491)10/8/1998 8:26:00 PM
From: MrGreenJeans  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 15132
 
AJC / Bob Brinker

AJC downward revision of earnings estimates on the S & P likewise had no effect on the market.

It is interesting that AJC's forecast and Brinker's profit forecast for the S and P are converging. It is also interesting that she like Bob is calling for a 1250 S and P in 1999. It is also reassuring.



To: Justa Werkenstiff who wrote (1491)10/9/1998 12:55:00 AM
From: mister topes  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 15132
 
Remember those posts that claimed that AJC was a Marketimer
subscriber and she simply copies the predictions in Marketimer
and used them for her GS forecasts? Well, guess what.
On Thursday AJC reduced her 1998 estimated S & P 500
operating earnings number to $49.00, which is the EXACT
number Brinker is using in Marketimer!!!
And she also lowered her 1999 estimate to $52.50, which
is now just $1.00 above Marketimer's 1999 forecast.
Imagine, GS could save all that money they pay her
by simply subscribing to Marketimer and using the numbers
therein. And for this they call AJC a market guru?