Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Maxam Gold Corp. OBB:MXAM -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: go4it who wrote (5961)	10/9/1998 5:58:00 AM
From: Chuca Marsh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11603

No, we did NOT take turns writting this, I was up East Coast Early to write, about a thousand words on Claim Group Business....Hyper is what hyper does, and we do...so far this morning...I received two Chuck Bankes E Mails...only one on Maxam, as I recall...and nothing on POSTING - in any respects. Truth. Chuca( Maybe this is another reason I like the Digit- 2)??? ? P.S.- Methinks the sleppers out west, just may not understand what will happen in years to come. Ions attaching ( and Salt Encapsultating) was in the past, ions found and matrixing is the future, and I am not a chemist. P.P.S.- Thanks for the "good" rec, Good Old Charley Brown, did you grow up hearing that quip all the time as I did? Peanuts is now the current topic. ( Until Extraction is Demonstrated at the "movable Pilot Plant- That moveit part was stated by Dale in that special AGM !)

To: go4it who wrote (5961)	10/9/1998 8:18:00 AM
From: Richard Mazzarella	Respond to of 11603

Charles, isn't obvious to everyone by now that WL has an agenda beyond saving us poor misinformed Maxam investors? He asked me lots of questions, changed his tune in some issues were he eventually found himself technically wrong, but doesn't answer my question if he is short. I have lots of respect for shorts like Laser who up-front say they don't believe a story and put there money where their mouth is. WL may just be a manipulative short dishonestly arguing technical issues. He may not give a rats ass what Maxam eventually does, as long as the stock goes down for his financial gain. It's very easy to profess doubt and make claims not shown by demonstrated current practice. The issue here is very very simple. As Maxam proves 5.7MM oz the stock becomes $3 fair valued, however with doubt its fair valued at <$1. To beat it up at $0.20 is ridiculous. WL's argument has nothing to do about fair value. He is either short or has some other vested interest in Maxam failing. Take your pick, either works.

To: go4it who wrote (5961)	10/9/1998 11:46:00 AM
From: WLAVEL	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 11603

Hi, Have mined black sands for many years.. Have dredged with 2, 4,6 and 8 inch dredges...Have dry washed in desert most of my adult years...Black sand concentrates can be very valuable and in all mining operations are never overlooked. Now if MAXAM had previously mentioned that they were exploring areas of high concentrations of black sand the whole operation would have a lot better chance of succeeding instead of saying that the entire area was just loaded with gold and the proven ore reserves are predicated on our drilling and testing..They more or less led people to believe that there was conformity just about all over the place.. Yes, black sands are good , this is where the heavy material is and most likely is the best place to mine...Someone should have told MAXAM that in the first place.. WL.