Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Les H who wrote (8418)	10/9/1998 12:06:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

Les, what does this have to do with the message you're responding to? Is this a segue from "coverup" to "accountability"? Right now, there's only one thing that Starr's come forward with on the impeachment front, and any coverup / obstruction of justice / conspiracy on the matter seems to be in the past. Well, except for the Tom Delay definition, where saying anything bad about Ken Starr is obstruction of justice. Most people would say they know more than they ever wanted to about the whole matter. Iran/Contra, there was never an end to the coverup. Watergate, the tapes may or may not have been fully released at this point, but there was certainly no admission of anything before Nixon resigned. Of course, that's off topic, ancient history, whatever. We all know that in legal matters precedents are generally considered totally irrelevant. Cheers, Dan.

To: Les H who wrote (8418)	10/9/1998 1:58:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

Les, re: Health Care Task Force fiasco What is the problem you people have with this? Hillary advocated a Canadian style system - which, btw was a popular theme at the time. She put together a proposal and it didnt fly - SO WHAT. What is the issue here huh? We are better off for having investigated this type of solution. Clinton gained a lot of votes precisely because he was willing to dedicate resources to some of these domestic issues - the Bush admin never did that. Again, whats your problem?