SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DanZ who wrote (16270)10/10/1998 11:18:00 AM
From: Brian Lempel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
Dan, I heard some time ago that Nokia was going with the VLSI ASICS, too.

Brian



To: DanZ who wrote (16270)10/10/1998 2:33:00 PM
From: Ramus  Respond to of 152472
 
Dan, Bluetooth technology is aimed at wireless connectivity between devices. It is not a new form or wireless for mobile such as GSM or CDMA.

From the Bluetooth website:

"The Bluetooth air interface is based on a nominal antenna power of
0dBm. The air interface complies with the FCC rules for the ISM
band at power levels up to 0dBm. Spectrum spreading has been
added to facilitate optional operation at power levels up to 100 mW
worldwide. Spectrum spreading is accomplished by frequency
hopping in 79 hops displaced by 1 MHz, starting at 2.402 GHz and
stopping at 2.480 GHz. Due to local regulations the bandwidth is
reduced in Japan, France and Spain. This is handled by an internal
software switch. The maximum frequency hopping rate is 1600
hops/s. The nominal link range is 10 centimeters to 10 meters, but
can be extended to more than 100 meters by increasing the
transmit power."

If you connected your laptop to your GSM phone today using Bluetooth true you would have a 1Mbit pipe from laptop to phone but you would still have a 9.6kbps pipe from your phone. Bluetooth won't really come into it's own (full utilization of it's 1mbps capacity) until the realization of 3G air interfaces.

W.



To: DanZ who wrote (16270)10/10/1998 4:04:00 PM
From: Quincy  Respond to of 152472
 
Lets compare chips:

Qualcomm's MSM3000: qualcomm.com
VLSI's VLSI+: vlsi.com

Give 'em both a lookover. I like VLSI. Most popular GSM chip manufacturer.

But, Q's 86Kbps data/IS95B support looks mighty attractive on the MSM3K.

Look forward to seeing what the future holds for both companies.

Houston is right, though. Bluetooth isn't intended to have much range. And, higher data rates aren't going to make the Nokia9000 more attractive to me. Sorry.



To: DanZ who wrote (16270)10/10/1998 6:02:00 PM
From: Jon Koplik  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
Dan - regarding ... It is my understanding that MOT uses their own ASICs in their handsets

I thought MOT (basically) almost bet their whole handset franchise on developing their own CDMA ASIC, failed miserably, and then gave up and agreed to buy Qualcomm ASIC chips through a face-saving back door route (from a Korean company that buys the chips from QCOM before re-selling them to MOT).

If this is wrong, someone please correct me.

Jon.



To: DanZ who wrote (16270)10/13/1998 12:01:00 AM
From: JGoren  Respond to of 152472
 
Major handset manufacturer, IMHO, would have to be Ericy or MOT. Mot has already acknowledged the problems of getting to market with its own ASIC, so my bet is MOT.