Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Lacelle who wrote (8783)	10/10/1998 1:51:00 PM
From: Who, me?	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

John, didn't we have a process that could be followed before the Independent Counsel law was written? What was it that was used to investigate Nixon? Special Prosecutor? The OIC law, as it exists today, has left some undesirable consequences. So something has to be rewritten when renewal comes up! Of course, when you see Reno blatantly ignore the current OIC laws by not appointing an Independent Counsel for the Chinagate situation as Freeh and the other guy recommended, then what good does it have to have a law at all? The Clinton administration seems to only abide by the laws that choose to acknowledge!