Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (8822)	10/10/1998 4:24:00 PM
From: Dwight E. Karlsen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

You yourself just stated that Clinton's actions (extramarital oral-sex with a subordinate employee) were not immoral. Therefore, who me? was not insulting you when she implied you were "sleeping with management" at Oracle. -GGG- ;-)

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (8822)	10/10/1998 6:11:00 PM
From: Who, me?	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 67261

Michelle, why don't you tell the whole story? Let's go back through it, step by step: It started with this post where you gave your opinion of the first woman to be on the board of a Fortune 500 company and you made reference to her negative appearance and insinuated that something else must have been involved with her getting the position. You then proceeded to call the wife of the founder of the Rutherford Institute and Idiot and make fun of her. Message 5946645 I responded with the post that you pointed out! Mine was rude but yours was not? Message 5946848 You responded by suggesting that, because someone weighs 300 pounds, she shouldn't have the job! Message 5946923 I responded suggesting that someone's qualifications should determine their eligibility for a job, not their appearance. Message 5947045 You responded with a brief history of her academically. Message 5947310 I responded with this, suggesting that maybe she slept with someone who like fat women. I mean, after all, you'd told us that she was fat and unqualified and you really didn't know how she got the job! Message 5947338 Now lets follow this sequence: Message 5946381 It started with this post from you calling Kathleen Willey tacky! Message 5945203 JLA said this: Message 5945251 brees said this: Message 5945776 We were only following up on your opinionated views of others! Which brings us to the last series! You said this to alan w, who was responding to me. You suggested I had a 6th grade education: Message 5964050 JLA said this:https://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=5964282 Then you said this and suggested that I had now moved up to 7th grade: Message 5964346 I responded with this. Notice I said <<maybe sleeping with management to get a job does exist in CA!!! >> I was following up on the "fat" lady from Apple: techstocks.com Now, I did not go into the post that you referenced from Robert because, quite frankly, I'm trying to forget the horrible attacks he makes on anyone of faith or anyone that disagrees with him. Much worse than you do, btw. So, here's the memory lane and it adds up to how we got here! Are there any innocent victims here?