Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Compaq -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LauA who wrote (34554)	10/12/1998 2:30:00 PM
From: Jeng Chiu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 97611

Wait a few days for the numbers to come out and you can analyze it yourself.

To: LauA who wrote (34554)	10/12/1998 4:04:00 PM
From: isdsms	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 97611

Greenberg's sources have been short sellers with an interest in moving stock price. I have read many things that he has written that have been out and out fabrications. He writes what he is given. I wish I could remember the name of his source...something Brothers. Ira

To: LauA who wrote (34554)	10/12/1998 6:19:00 PM
From: Sleeperz	Respond to of 97611

That may have been the case when Greenberg worked for the SF Chronicle. But now Greenberg works for the "street.com" for that Kramer dude. Greenberg has to tow the compnay line now. He is no longer an independant journalist. BTW that Kramer dude lost alot on the now Bankrupt Hayes!!! CL >>> I'm beginning to worry about CPQ. Greenberg has better sources than I do, and he digs for information a lot harder than posters on this thread. I've followed him for years at the SF Chronicle and found him to be quite honest, if not always right. Contrary to what I see posted, he does not take positions in stocks. Hence he's not a shill like so many here. <<<<