Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Short Squeezes -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Spider Valdez who wrote (144)	10/13/1998 10:59:00 AM
From: tonto	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 182

Spider, you keep saying the document is phoney but refuse to post what is phoney in the posted document, or to post a different copy. A reporter for the Las Vegas Sun has gone to the courthouse and read the file. This is his response to my question concerning whether or not the document as posted by Bill is real or not: From: XXXXXX@lasvegassun.com> Thu 13:40 Subject: re: Re: [Fwd: Here are the Documents that you requested] To:XXXXXX XXX, I've gone over and read through the entire case file, but I don't have copies of the docs. The actual order was not yet in the file (they're federal govt. clerks after all -- it takes them a few days), but it's consistent with what the clerks had entered on the docket sheet. You say it is not even close. An impartial newspaper reporter advised it is consistent. Please validate your claim. TIA.