Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Charles Hughes who wrote (9261)	10/13/1998 5:08:00 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

And you got an A? Here read the question again, I'll write it with emphasis for you..... If one good is desirable, wouldn't two be better? As your Clinton question, the answer is NO. As I said to Michelle I would rather see 1 good parent than 2 lousy ones. Bill Clinton is a womanizer, Hillary is an enabler, I would have more respect for Hillary as a parent if she left the lying philanderer and by example taught her daughter that women deserve respect and should not be expected to live in an abusive environment.... bp

To: Charles Hughes who wrote (9261)	10/13/1998 5:11:00 PM
From: one_less	Respond to of 67261

<<Isn't it totally obvious that children should not be raised in unhappy homes?>> Well, that was certainly the outcry 20 years ago when it was popular to say women couldn't have their own identity unless they left marriage to find themselves. Ask the large number of people who've grown up without an involved father how they feel about that. The folks (with some exceptions) who grew up and entered adult life from intact families certainly seem happy to have known and been influenced by both parents.