Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (33857)	10/13/1998 9:00:00 PM
From: Cynic 2005	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 132070

Hi Paul, Let us just assume that he is. That is OK with us - what we hate the most here is cheerleading for stocks and brown-nosing the corporate officers who are less than honest. Yes, that includes Intel. BTW, I second what Mike says and I am not jealous nor am I short. I just think that Intel management is resorting to cheap tricks in liu of good performance.

To: Paul Engel who wrote (33857)	10/13/1998 10:19:00 PM
From: Skeeter Bug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

paul, you still touting xlnx? HO HO HO HO! what about altr? remember when you said i didn't understand that business didn't matter - only technology did and that xlnx and altr would go high - than the $50s? i said business was all that mattered. basic economics. you appear not to have learned from this schooling ;-) HO HO HO HO HO! you don't debate the facts, huh? you just spin them. how many q's until intel has 50% of current revenues with consistent GREAT (your words) 1.5% decreases in revenues? intel is a great success story. that isn't the point. just like xlnx and altr's COOL TECHNOLOGY isn't the point. supply and demand going forward is. sure hope you didn't take your own advice on xlnx and altr... ;-)