Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Maxam Gold Corp. OBB:MXAM -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tim Hall who wrote (6083)	10/13/1998 10:43:00 PM
From: Chuca Marsh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11603

"" It is also possible to now speculate the pm's are contained in the material that is minus 20 mesh but can't be efficiently recovered until this material is ground to minus 150 mesh. If Maxam has narrowed this down, they should be able to report on the minerals that contain the precious metals. "" Ask yourself Tim, if you put a real thought process to work to the logical conclusion, as I forcast hypothethically here. Will it show better results with run of the Mill dirt, or would one wait for HIGH GRADE DIRT? This is not a critism, just an observation. And <<..I present this not as criticism of Maxam but just some practical food for thought. ..>> Eat hearty folks. Fish fry soon!!! ! Yes! Hell with that tack and Dwell...LOBSTER all around! I'll box some tails for Tims Peppers Recipees. NEWTACK&DWELLonit Mining. NEWTECH. Leather harnesses are for riding lobsters instead of horses. ChucaVBG2

To: Tim Hall who wrote (6083)	10/13/1998 10:51:00 PM
From: Richard Mazzarella	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11603

Tim, thanks for the education. Maxam did tell me that they would even like to sieve to 48 mesh if cost effective. How do you think that a sieving operation compares to hard rock for cost? You mentioned the need to have dry ore for screening. A benefit of the desert?