SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Microsoft - The Evil empire -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Robert Winchell who wrote (1421)10/14/1998 6:00:00 PM
From: Charles Tutt  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1600
 
Re: "You have the release version of NT 5.0? Read it again - 'current efforts'. They know NT4 doesn't cut it."

So they'll be innovative "Real Soon Now."



To: Robert Winchell who wrote (1421)10/17/1998 7:23:00 AM
From: rudedog  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1600
 
Robert -
wasn't there a lawsuit between DEC and MSFT over what went into NT?

I don't remember that. I certainly don't recall and charges of code stealing.

Prior to leaving DEC in 1988 to start NT development at MSFT, Dave Cutler was heading up a program called 'PRISM' at DECWest. PRISM combined hardware (including a fast 64 bit RISC processor) and innovative software, the core of which was code-named 'MICA'.

DEC later claimed that portions of MICA ended up in NT. They threatened to sue MS and also Cutler individually.

It never went to trial, so the merits of DEC's claims were never tested, but there is no doubt that NT owes much of its heritage to the design thinking that Cutler did for RSX-11, VAX VMS and also for MICA.

Designing from scratch does not mean ignoring the 50 years of thinking about how computer systems ought to operate. NT is certainly not a 'derivative' OS in the way that Solaris or HP-UX are. The only major UNIX which comes close to a 'from scratch' effort is DEC UNIX, which was based on Rick Rashid's MACH kernel rather than the AT&T / BSD UNIX.