Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Borzou Daragahi who wrote (8281)	10/15/1998 12:24:00 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

>>but blowing up that pharmaceutical factory--which has to date has not been conclusively linked to terrorists--was downright criminal.<< Criminal yes, but not impeachable........ bp

To: Borzou Daragahi who wrote (8281)	10/15/1998 1:41:00 PM
From: mrknowitall	Respond to of 13994

Borzou - the pharmaceutical factory attack wasn't criminal - just stupid. Now, having said that, the fact that he kept his plan from most of the more qualified members of his staff also points up something that we should all be concerned about: Apparently, Mr. Clinton does not think everyone in his administration is worthy of his trust. Could it be that the administration is in meltdown over some of the member's lack of trust for our "liar in chief?" Funny - lying may really count in the minds of some people. Mr. K.

To: Borzou Daragahi who wrote (8281)	10/15/1998 4:41:00 PM
From: jbe	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

what they giveth they may taketh away... Note from the grammar police: "giveth" is 3rd person singular; "givest" is 2nd person singular; in 1st person singular and plurals, it is "give." Thus: What they give they may take away. Shame on you, Borzou! Tsk, tsk! Otherwise, on your substantive points, you are right, of course. :-) In addition, I would question the right of the United States to take any unilateral act of this kind, even if it seems "justified." We have done so many times in the pre-Clinton past, of course. But what if some other country decided to follow our example? jbe