Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : 3DFX -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Simon Cardinale who wrote (8268)	10/15/1998 7:13:00 PM
From: jttmab	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 16960

Simon, Certainly there is a consensus about the analysts expertise. My prior post to Sun is applicable to your post as well so I won't bother repeating. There is little point in debating about it anyway, it should be pretty clear when we hear the conference call. Regards, Jim

To: Simon Cardinale who wrote (8268)	10/15/1998 7:51:00 PM
From: Curbstone	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 16960

I figure the analysts, after getting badly burned to the upside for 2 quarters simply split the difference this time around. Unfortunately that move just happened to coincide with better and more accurate infomation from TDFX than they were accustomed to. Heck man, TDFX is new at this, so TDFX and the analysts dance around each other like two crabs on the beach for a few quarters. This was the best effort to date, the glass is half full (after one-time gulps have been factored out). Now, back to what's REALLY important, what does several mean? Has it really come to this? Mike