Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : VLVT (was CSMA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: lewis wireman who wrote (9891)	10/15/1998 11:46:00 PM
From: KZAP	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 11708

I will not back up others actions. I don't know who didn't keep their end of the bargain. IMO it appeared to me that CSMA didn't keep their end of the deal with Mike Pickens. Here's one reason why. I have never seen any evidence that there is a 2 million dollar EPA clean-up needed. (If CSMA says that there is one, I would ask to see the papers, proof.) I KNOW that CSMA didn't Drill a new well. It was well stated their agreement and intent to drill "up to eight". I KNOW there is a agreement signed to that effect. Yes, I have a stack of papers about CSMA agreements. I have notes, faxes and e-mails. I've talked to everyone I know that knows anything about CSMA. I will say that the M3 report was rushed and was written, IMHO, hurriedly and was the result of misleading info. I have considered the "facts" that the writer of the report had to go on. Didn't we all conclude that the report was relatively accurate from the info released by CSMA? You cannot conclude "conflict of interest" after the fact. IMO Who in their right mind wouldn't have sold stock when they could have a 1,000% return on investment? No brainer! That isn't trading on insider info, IMO, that's just good business sense. (I'd sell anything I own at a 1,000% profit!!!) This is all Just My Opinion. KZAP

To: lewis wireman who wrote (9891)	10/16/1998 7:23:00 AM
From: Gary Jacobs	Respond to of 11708

As you know, many of us relied heavily upon your report when we purchased. good point lewis. gary

To: lewis wireman who wrote (9891)	10/16/1998 10:48:00 AM
From: Mr. Sparky	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 11708

I'm not trying to do anything but get what is coming to me. I have delivered on everything that I ever said that I would with this company. I put a quarter million dollars into the company, flew an analyst to the annual meeting and paid to have an excellent report written, based upon information that we got from them, sold them a property that they wanted to buy from me, and got screwed. Lewis, do you not see the handwriting on the wall by now? Does it not appear that there is a pattern here. They write their own press releases, I do not. I sold them appx. 200 acres of leases, and due to their, third party analysis, which they speak of in the press release, it looked like the structure was appx 10 times that size. That is what is referred to as a "prospect". The contract plainly says that they are buying the "attached" leases with associated equipment. And what is this minority suit crap? What does that mean exactly. Something that you made up? I still own stock. Over a million shares. I did not renig on the deal, they did. It is the same old CSMA pump and dump deal. Make a press release, if it doesn't pump the stock, dump the deal. We write our reports on what management tells us. How else can we write a report? We will never write another report on a BB company, because they are all liars. And don't go blaming me because this stock is at 8 cents or you will be hiring attornies. We have taped conversations, notes, correspondence back and forth concerning the report so our ass is covered. Is yours.