SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Borzou Daragahi who wrote (8374)10/16/1998 2:12:00 AM
From: greenspirit  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13994
 
Borzou, well said, and I can see where you are coming from. I guess where I see things considerably different is that I wasn't around then to vote so it really doesn't concern me that much. The issue is today and the future. Accepting leaders who are morally bankrupt is wrong to me. I'm only a few years older than you and yet the answer is very clear to me. We deserve better in our leader than this charade of an example. I honestly feel like it wouldn't matter whether he was Republican or Democrat. The man should be fired! He abused his office, he lied to our face, and he carried on in the Oval Office using the judgment of a teenager. He lied in court, rifled through our FBI files, ruined a mans character in the travel office, and I'm sure a whole lot more.

Why do we need to accept this? Because some Presidents have done other things in the past? This is today. Al Gore would be a decent President, the country doesn't depend on William Jefferson Clinton to grow and prosper. We are going to get rid of him in two years anyway, why not start the healing now?

Why do we need to keep this President in office? Do you honestly think in a few months this will all just go away? The man has broken faith with the people. Trust and trustworthiness are forever gone.

Michael



To: Borzou Daragahi who wrote (8374)10/16/1998 7:26:00 PM
From: Earl Risch  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13994
 
"And I'm all of a
sudden supposed to muster up some outrage over
this man's lying about an affair under oath?"


Borzou,

It appears to me that you are trying to trivialize the lying under oath, because it was about an affair. If I am mistaken, I apologize. ER