SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Asia Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bosco who wrote (7164)10/16/1998 2:36:00 PM
From: Zeev Hed  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 9980
 
Bosco, I have a lot of respect for AG and think he is managing the situation quite well. Few months back I mentioned that I thought he was in no rush of reducing the excessively high interest rates so he can use this weapon when really needed, in case of an impending or actual financial catastrophe. Well, he has been looking into his tea leaves (turnips anyone) and has decided that he sees enough trouble brewing that it is time to take out the big sticks. Luckily, he has ample room to maneuver because he was patient and did not reduce those rates as inflation was coming down.

That is one of the reasons I have turned bullish again (but I am not sure I will like the beginning of next week, which I think will be influenced from a dollar weakening too fast and thus declines in Asian markets, those turnips again).

Zeev



To: Bosco who wrote (7164)10/16/1998 3:33:00 PM
From: Cynic 2005  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 9980
 
Dear Bosco, unlike Zeev and others, I do not have ANY respect for Alan Greenspan. Here is note I posted elsewhere:
------
The latest move by Greenspan proves the point that he is one of the
most inept Fed Chairmen ever. In an article he wrote in the sixties he
lamented the easy money policies of the Feds in mid 20s which he
contends (and I agree) as the cause for the depression in the 30s. I
personally think that he managed to repeat exactly the same mistakes.
The easy money in the system was more than sufficient for a capacity
glut in almost all industries and found its way to the top of the
economy - financial markets. Without the backing of a fundamental
support, any speculative asset pile, a la stocks, can only grow to some
extent. When the mild profit taking turns in to a stampede to the exit
doors, things turn in to systemic threat - as they are now. It is too
late to act at this stage of the bubble than when it is controllable.
Despite the fact the Greenspan delivered the infamous "irrational
exuberance" speech, I think his real actions are a big suspect. He
acted more like a politician who would pulse the public and then act up
on them rather than being vigilant on the economy. Whether due to
incompetence or ignorance or both, no one other than Mr. Greenspan is
responsible for bringing the world economy to such a brink of disaster.
(I can explain more on that later.)