Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Engine Technologies (AENG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sir Auric Goldfinger who wrote (2064)	10/17/1998 7:24:00 PM
From: cornbread	Respond to of 3383

Auric, I can only comment on the differences between US pat 4022167 and AENG's patent 5813372. I hope you are getting Kristiansen patent as well. The basic operating principles are the same, in my opinion what Manthey has done has simplified the engine, by using piston plates instead of independently mounted pistons. The piston plates eliminated the need for elaborate guidance hardware. By eliminating the "usual" pistons, the fabrication and assembly of the engine is simplified. When you receive your patent it goes into to details on the advantages of this design compared to others. I can not argue with you on the lack of financials. Many of the points your bring up are valid. I would like to see the company follow a more traditional path of disclosure. It is my understanding that these steps are under way. It all come back to my fist posting. Will any engine company be willing to pay the fee's to use this design? Message 4732329