Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Systems, Strategies and Resources for Trading Futures -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jjs_ynot who wrote (6720)	10/19/1998 1:25:00 PM
From: coug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 44573

Scott, Dave, Yes, As of 10:15 pdt, looking for short entry.. Hope AG doesn't trump me.

To: jjs_ynot who wrote (6720)	10/19/1998 1:59:00 PM
From: Patrick Slevin	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 44573

<focus on bonds> Yeah, a few guys showed where their best models did passably well in the Bonds but got smashed in the spoos. Some of the gear heads suggested that the variables the traders had could be switched around; providing profitable trades by inverting the signals. I was not so enchanted by this approach. It's easy to say this stuff in a pristine environ. When there is cash on the line I wonder how many would be willing to trust such an assumption.