SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: mrknowitall who wrote (11424)10/19/1998 5:06:00 PM
From: ToySoldier  Respond to of 74651
 
LOL! See, and people are so quick to say legacy systems like TSO etc. are dead and shouldn't be a consideration in new architecture designs.

Many of my network designs for customers still deal with these "mature" types of systems (friendly way of saying old-crap) interfacing with demands of users living in the 90's. But they are too mission critical to be ignored.

I also have to interface with these systems on a daily basis to access many of our internal systems - ie. change management systems, resource directory, profs, time tracking, expense tracking, etc. EEKKK!

Toy



To: mrknowitall who wrote (11424)10/19/1998 6:04:00 PM
From: d[-_-]b  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 74651
 
mr k.

You don't need to be old to know about IBM stuff, just "lucky" enough to work for someone with a pile of mainframes. I was such a lucky person out of college to land a job at McDonnell Douglas with the largest IBM shop on the face of the earth.

It also helped that as a programmer I had free access to my very own copy of every manual I could have ever wanted. IBM if one thing only, they had very extensive documentation.

I was a rebel and wrote my code in IBM pascal, PL/1 and rexx, instead of cobol or fortran. All in all it was really nice to be in such a large consistent environment, actually liked PROFS, long before office calendar systems and email even existed on PC's.