SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Xilinx (XLNX) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Charlie Smith who wrote (2005)10/21/1998 9:20:00 AM
From: w2j2  Respond to of 3291
 
charlie, what is the code # for the cc? thanks



To: Charlie Smith who wrote (2005)10/21/1998 11:20:00 AM
From: uu  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 3291
 
Charlie:

Thank you for your very logical post. Glad to see someone on this board still has the reality checklist. Again thank you for your logical response and trying to bring back some of these shorts to reality.

On a separate subject I was just wondering if the title of this thread needs to be changed to XLNX (If you are Short come and post here? It seems I (and only a couple of others) are XLNX bulls on this thread, and the rest are just shorts trying to establish a wishful thinking club hoping for XLNX to drop to under $30 so they can cover the shares they have shorted in the low to high $30's)!

Regards,

Addi Jamshidi




To: Charlie Smith who wrote (2005)10/22/1998 12:18:00 AM
From: Knighty Tin  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3291
 
Charlie, It is amazing how apologists from companies can glibly slip from year to year comparisons to sequential comparisons when it suits them and think nobody will catch them. And then have the gall to claim seasonals as causation. Let's face it. Crappy quarter for a crappy co. Maybe it will get better if they get another 96 day run this quarter. -g-

MB