SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Source Media SRCM -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mama Bear who wrote (1362)10/21/1998 2:06:00 PM
From: Michael Bidder  Respond to of 3015
 
Acordingly MW is a lair.

I have been lurking. What appears obvious to me is MW is a slippery tout and will post anything regardless of the truth.

It's unlikely that one could loose $250,000 dollars and still be so optimistic. I think rather this person is insincere.

Michael Bidder



To: Mama Bear who wrote (1362)10/21/1998 2:18:00 PM
From: Anthony@Pacific  Respond to of 3015
 
Nice work Barb, I always knew there would be some real good ones I'm sure there are some really totuous ones as well ...just never took the time...too many flies to swat at as you dig....know what I mean?



To: Mama Bear who wrote (1362)10/22/1998 12:32:00 AM
From: Pluvia  Respond to of 3015
 
Great research Barb,

You deserve a pinky....

Speaking of which, after careless consideration, I have come up with a new rating system for terminal, flailing companies. The system incorporates the best of the Pink system - using "flies", but is more specific to the issues facing the company.

So without further scribble, I present the new pluvia rating system - only to be assigned to companies that cannot pass go, have mgnt that need to go straight to jail, and have a stock that is going to ZERO... Hereinafter officially to be know as the pluvia "Corpse" rating.

SRCM is officially rated a "stinking corpse - with flies" - thanks to the miserably rotten management on board.

All comments IMO

Cheers Steve



To: Mama Bear who wrote (1362)10/22/1998 10:36:00 AM
From: Sir Auric Goldfinger  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3015
 
And in fact it was the shorts, who circling 100 ft. above the rapidly dehydrating sorry POS, had the farsightedness to load up.