Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Global Platinum & Gold (GPGI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dennis DeNoble who wrote (8032)	10/21/1998 3:51:00 PM
From: san antonio group	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14226

Dennis, I sent you email hope you will respond to it! SAN ANTONIO GROUP

To: Dennis DeNoble who wrote (8032)	10/21/1998 4:01:00 PM
From: U.B. Green	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14226

Dennis, 15 t/d x 5 days x 2weeks =150 tons of enhanced head ore = 8 oz. goodies = .05 opt. Yes?

To: Dennis DeNoble who wrote (8032)	10/21/1998 9:54:00 PM
From: SnakeInATuxedo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14226

I note with dismay that yesterday's NR is still not posted to the GPGI Web page; therefore... Mr. DeNoble, it's time for GPGI to have an official Web site presence, one where dissemination of official Company information can be done and satisfy the necessary legal requirements while providing the immediacy and accessibility we all want. OT to Mr. DeNoble and others interested: here's a good example of a mining company's Web site that puts it all right before your eyes and ears... literally. pthr.com Onward. CL, the Only * This message will be re-posted daily until: a] it receives a response b] I'm thrown off of SI Either outcome will be acceptable to me.

To: Dennis DeNoble who wrote (8032)	10/24/1998 7:26:00 PM
From: d:oug	Respond to of 14226

Dennis, I'am not currently holding any GPGI shares, but I'am trying to collect information to decide if to buy in. The SI link that follows is your introduction as an employee of GPGI to this thread. I copied a few sentences after the link. I'am not asking about the past or future, just the present. What is the current status of GPGI. Not this thread's understanding and take. But the official, thru you. Or thru the person you mentioned in your post, copied below. Any answer from you, as a reply to this post is welcome. A "no comment" is a valid reply. Message 3298712 To all, While I have posted very few messages to this thread, I do read them all. After all, I am one of you. Therefore I do like the idea of a single person to maintain contact for the group. This person can communicate with the group and act as a conduit between us. I feel that establishing such a dialog can only benefit Global Platinum & Gold. After all you are our shareholders. It is extremely important for us to maintain close and good relations with our shareholders. I look forward to making verbal contact with your selected representative. Keep the Faith, Dennis --- There are 5 replies to this post of Dennis's I copied below from one of them. --- concerning the policing of these threads. We don't now have a problem, but certainly may in the future. Your position with GPGI would be a very useful defense to see that we are not bothered by those who would make false accusations concerning the company and it's officers. We need to get tough on those irresponsible people. --- Thanks Doug

To: Dennis DeNoble who wrote (8032)	10/25/1998 2:24:00 AM
From: d:oug	Respond to of 14226

Dennis. Subject: My prior post to you yesterday, Oct 24 Saturday. In my prior post I referenced your post to this thread in which you outlined your past work activity, along with other qualifications of yourself that you feel will be a positive in doing your job assigment. The following is copied from your post: >>> I have been privileged, in my past, to have worked for two very enlightened very well managed corporations, Itel and IBM. <<< Hypothetical: Have a job assignment to be completed by a single person. 100 persons to choose from to do the job. How to choose 1 in a 100. A test, consisting of answering five questions in one hour. All 100 take the test. Of the 100, 10 get score of outstanding. Now to test these 10 to be able to choose 1. Same test, different questions, but same degree of difficulity. Now add in one more factor. When the first tests were given, all went smoothly. The room was quiet. Good lighting. No interruptions. But this time the tests will be conducted in a poorly managed way. This time lets see if those that do outstanding under good conditions can also perform the same way when things go wrong. Results: Only 3 of the 10 did outstanding. 2 actually did poor. Dennis, you said about yourself, "I have...worked for two very well managed corporations..." Either you are restricted by your boss to communicate more with this thread, or you are doing the best you know how. I'am still betting that Mike McKay will put GPGI onto a good and correct path for near future profitability. And that this will happen in the current isolation from this thread, as in day by days updates. Almost as if you are not a deciding factor, and thus not needed. If so, you should say so and let this thread understand that until an official web site (hopefully the one under construction) is made, that your role is elsewhere. Doug