Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Valley Resources (BV-ASE) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: checkmate who wrote (112)	10/22/1998 10:29:00 AM
From: bcjt	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 231

Yes this deal is larger than what the ASE usually deals with.But the information the ASE wants is the same info on the list that BV got in jan/98.I think it took BV longer to put the info together than they thought it would,i also think BV can & hopefully will put the deal together shortly with the ase's blessing or without.Who knows maybe we will be trading by this monday or next monday!!In the long run all shareholders will be rewarded by BV,they also have a strong mining side to the company as well!For BV this has been a learning curve as it would be for any company with this much on there plate.As for the land it was tied up(pending) last year i think.Been here for years,will stay here for years.And yes there has been a little mis-leading going on.

To: checkmate who wrote (112)	10/22/1998 11:08:00 AM
From: gekko	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 231

C mate you do not have to look any further then BV's news release to see who's shoulders the blame sits. They are changing the direction of the company and they do not want to show a feasibility study? Ok the ASE is now saying they will not make them show a feasibility report but they need just a bit more info!!?? Wow after more then 2 months someone turns a light on in the heads of BV's board of directors and they see that maybe they should give that info now. 1) Wood hardening patents, who would of thought that showing proof you have the rights to the process would be important. 2) Independent third party report, you know something that might confirm the fine veneer process they talk of actually works, besides taking the word of those who are going to directly profit from the deal. 3) Identity of the parties providing financing, I know its only 25 M but seen as how it is a public company there may be a few people interested in that info. I know any monkey can eat a banana but I didn't know they could run a public company??!! I have my fingers crossed that some how they get lucky and BV comes back trading and us share holders make a profit or at least break even.