Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rajala who wrote (16918)	10/22/1998 9:01:00 AM
From: gdichaz	Respond to of 152472

To Rajala: Are invective and insults persuasive in your view? Curious. Chaz

To: Rajala who wrote (16918)	10/22/1998 10:40:00 AM
From: engineer	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 152472

If you continually use wrong facts to prove it then how can you even say "CDMA1 WLL" is a dog? Your facts are based on some other technology and the limitations you list are from that other technology. You do not present facts of the technology you say you know about. You respond with some inane argument about signalling which is totally false. My "friend" Q did NOT say that singalling was the problem. You have said this more than 3 times now and still you have nothing to back it up. There is no signalling. You have had 3 responses as to how it works. It is NOT signalling, this never changes. It is still one bit every 20 ms frame of 192 bits (if you cared to read the standard). What changes is the statistics of the channel and the ability of DSP software loops to track the power control. A better estimatation allows the power control loops to track closer, thus providing the best estimate of the channel and getting another 3 dB out of the users by allowing more to the stacked as addtitive white noise in the channel. Also there is less probability that users will all suddenly move around, thus requireing more handoff channel reserve channels. People of the world look at a desk phone and use it as a desk phone, especially if it looks like a box which just hooks into their existing house wiring and can power up regular simple phones (no phone capabilites what so ever..QCT-6200). Or if it is connected into the house FAX machine. You may be able to use the phone as a mobile by putting it into your car and driving around, but not too many people do this. I do not know what your "CDMA1" tehcnology is, since it is not what has been proposed by anyone. Is this CDMAOne, CDMA2000, IS-95A, IS-95C, WCDMA, BCDMA? Please enumerate on this so that I can understand if this is the difference in our communications? You have made a presumption that "CDMA1 WLL" is a dog and that it will not have any use in the world. but you have not presented any real facts to prove that other than ones from another technology (not CDMA) and innuendo, yet you rant on with such authority. Please present your articles and MBA's reports so that we can all read them. Seems that you still cannot hold a real technical discussion nor do you want to help us understand technically what you mean. I agree that this discussion is going nowhere, but then that is where it started before I was participating....