Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Ericsson overlook? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JGoren who wrote (2178)	10/22/1998 2:09:00 PM
From: DMaA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5390

ERICY may have the opportunity to fudge the patent facts but what could be their motive? If they're lying it will be easily and quickly be revealed.

To: JGoren who wrote (2178)	10/22/1998 4:45:00 PM
From: Mesaba	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5390

Everyone is speaking from a position of disinformation. All questions will be answered in due time. Personally, I would suspect that the US patent office is unwilling to answer any questions about patents, firm or unfirm, that are in process. That and the fact that the patent office in your town doesn't have a clue as to what the patent office in my town is up to. C'mon, it's the government! ;-) It helps if you put all information, positive or negative, through the logic filters. Why would QualComm lie? They probably wouldn't. Why would Ericcson lie? They probably wouldn't either. Therefor there is probably just a misunderstanding. M