Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (10947)	10/23/1998 4:36:00 PM
From: Bill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

<<Would you believe in making pork illegal? Many homosexual practices are, still, though sadly the law isn't enforced much.>> Am I reading your statement correctly? Do you really mean that it is sad that the law is not enforced?

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (10947)	10/23/1998 4:41:00 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

<<Would you believe in making pork illegal? >> Make pork illegal? What are you talking about? Pork is a Pig. How do you make a pig illegal? Does the pig have to get a cow license to be legal? You are not making any sense. Yes eating (a behavior) pork is forbidden to me by my beliefs, and it is forbidden to others who hold to the same beliefs. Its not illegal or sinful to be a homosexual. It is just a condition or attitude at best. It's not illegal or sinful for me, a heterosexual, to have a thought pass through my brain about a woman that I have no right to, it might be illegal or sinful for me to act on that thought. The political agenda of people who are supporting homosexual behavior/lifestyle includes a whole lot more than the acceptance of the condition. It starts with education initiatives to tolerate, accept, condone, support, and celebrate the lifestyle. The people with this agenda aren't necessarily gay. You can take example's from this thread if you want. Adultery has been thrown in as an acceptable lifestyle. Promiscuity is included in this as a lifestyle. So, the logical follow up is indoctrinate children to accept, understand, support, encourage and that plans for a successful individual and society in general includes education, preparation and planning for such when they enter adulthood. It would be unfair and discriminatory to do otherwise. Why does it matter to you whether or not I think KJV is infallible. It is not my religion or reference. That religious scholars want to study the exact phoneme of a syllable and some of them find a slight shift in meaning; or that they have comparative doctrines that do the same, should mean little or nothing to the folks out side of that discipline. You and the other "non-religeous" people of this thread have done an excellent job of ringing in the wake up calls. You seem to have a basic if not thourough understanding of the spirit of the teachings, and the principles supported by the text. As far as who will burn in hell with who. Everything I understand with reference to the KJV indicates the job of deciding that is taken. Most of what I read on this thread is a paranoia from the non-religious, that the religious folk are trying to fix the deal with God. Sorry ahead of time for using my own thoughts and logic instead of cut and paste substantial facts.