Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Market Gems:Stocks w/Strong Earnings and High Tech. Rank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jenna who wrote (17518)	10/24/1998 9:36:00 AM
From: alruss	Respond to of 120523

IDXC - Down from 49 to 36 after meeting expectations? The report looked good to me, but this drop has gone below previous resistance at 40-41. Did I miss something? Anyone any ideas? Long term holder and short term Knife catcher (ouch!)

To: Jenna who wrote (17518)	10/25/1998 9:47:00 PM
From: michael katz	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 120523

Jenna, Trying to access weekly newsletter from the market gems site and I keep receiving this message. Help! File Not Found The requested URL /newsletters34g.html was not found on this server.

To: Jenna who wrote (17518)	10/26/1998 9:31:00 PM
From: David Meyer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 120523

Hi Jenna - not sure I understand what you are saying. Did you leave some words out? "There will probably not be any or few watch lists the night because of subscribers but it works out fine.. Subscribers are prepared from 1-7 days in advance with our picks and yet membes of SI who might never get anything more than perhaps a watch list that is never followed up will be getting some 'stocks' calls throughout the day." Should "lists the night because" read 'lists the night before because of subscribers'. And if so what did we subscribers do? <gg> PLease clarify when you have time. thanks dpm