SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jbe who wrote (10973)10/23/1998 8:24:00 PM
From: dougjn  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 67261
 
If Clinton really has only agreed to look at it again, and perhaps under a somewhat different procedure or something, I have no problem.

Really, though, I must say I will be guided by what happens. On Oct. 1 Clinton turned down another request for clemency. What has changed since?

I firmly believe no clemency is warranted. The notion that Israel is a "friendly" country hardly covers the waterfront, or excuses the action, so far as I am concerned.

Sure, they have generally been our ally. Or more accurately, we have been theirs. (What they have done for us is very limited, and has hardly offset the enormous geopolitical jeopardy we have placed ourselves under by supporting them. Yes, they have sometimes had better Middle East on the ground intelligence than we have had, and it has on a few occasions been of some use to us. But the overwhelming truth is that this country has paid an enormous price to support Israel. We have done so for humanitarian, and ideological reasons, initially, increasingly mixed with domestic ethnic politics. I almost always agree with US support for Israel.)

However, I utterly reject the notion that a U.S. citizen of divided loyalties should be free to pass highly classified information to the other object of their affection, under the theory that the "wrong" people have too much influence in the United States, and that this country is accordingly too little compliant with the needs of their first love.

Frankly, such action is treason. That is, if it violates the national secrets laws of the United States. Which Pollard's actions most assuredly did, and to a HUGE degree.

Life imprisonment is too light in my view. I say never release him. And to ever release him under Israeli pressure deeply offends me.

He may be an Israeli patriot. He is an American traitor. I am an American. He is in an American jail. DO NOT RELEASE HIM.

Doug




To: jbe who wrote (10973)10/23/1998 8:31:00 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 67261
 
<<Sure, Pollard was a spy. But he was spying for a "friendly country." >>

What did you just say? That doesn't sound original because I've never seen such a lame and weak statement come from you.

Spying for a "friendly country" against the US, right? The act was High treason against the US. What is this, for a "friendly country" dribble?

If you steal all the Gold from Fort Knox to help pay off Canada's National debt, is it a friendly thing to do?