Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Systems, Strategies and Resources for Trading Futures -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SE who wrote (7267)	10/26/1998 6:38:00 PM
From: Patrick Slevin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 44573

X101 is definitely possible. Currently I'm up to X15 and only 2 have approached possible real money test. I could blow out a dozen Neural Net systems a week if I tried hard. Matter of fact, I think after this year I shall start naming them X99.. and then the number. I would bet I could throw out a hundred or more before I even got close to one that "might" be usable in real trading. The only reason X9 has a number is because it got through early tests. Right now it's up 74.6 points. I wish the sucker would go short so I could try it with real money. EDIT The 41 point loser occurred during the Fed change-up. The system definitely looks like it has legs. It's been tested for this type of sideways market....a market that reverts to a trend may hurt the results but the design was for this sideways stuff and it's got one loser for 6 winners.