Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The Justa & Lars Honors Bob Brinker Investment Club -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: marc ultra who wrote (1836)	10/26/1998 7:21:00 PM
From: Boca_PETE	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 15132

Marc U: RE:<what might be acceptable proof of intent when selling designated shares over the net> When I sold my 200 shares of UTEK, I did a telephone sale with my Broker, Discover. I told them to sell the shares originally purchased on 10.27 and 28, 1997. In the confirmation advice, they added a notation under UTEK's company name "VSP 10/27, 10/28/97". Imho, it seems reasonable that this will be sufficient proof of the specifically identified shares I sold. Of course, one never knows for sure until one is actually audited (hopefully never)and then you can always appeal. P

To: marc ultra who wrote (1836)	10/28/1998 12:59:00 PM
From: marc ultra	Respond to of 15132

Russell 2000 significantly underperforming today and is down while SP500 up. One morning does not break a trend and some profit taking is reasonable but I think if this move to the small caps is going to be big and sustainable I would prefer to see a relentless major outperformance for an extended time to start chipping money away from the big indexes into the Russell. There is too much history of fake out moves sucking money into small caps just to restart pathetic underperformance again. Marc