Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Borzou Daragahi who wrote (11370)	10/27/1998 5:10:00 PM
From: Peter O'Brien	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

O.K., thanks for your response, and it is certainly a consistent position... I wanted to test if people were also willing to afford "special" protection to "politically incorrect" persons... I had expected some people might argue that slave owners should view their special security requirements as another "cost of doing business" that should not be provided by the federal government. This is not to say that the assassination of slave owners is condoned, or that the terrorist abolitionists should not be prosecuted, but merely that any "special" protection (beyond what ordinary citizens already receive) is not the government's responsibility.