SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: PMS Witch who wrote (11880)10/28/1998 11:34:00 AM
From: Bearded One  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74651
 
Microsoft lost bigtime to STAC, for $120 million. They got about $4 million back in a countersuit. Microsoft also had to give up their buyout of Intuit-- that wasn't a real lawsuit, but a legal challenge on which they capitulated. Microsoft also seems to have lost a lawsuit by their temporary workers over compensation, though I'm unaware of the details of that.

So yes, Microsoft does lose lawsuits. And it looks to me like they've already lost this one.

Ed, your strange interpretation of Dan Rosen's email won't wash. The email was specifically in relation to the June 21, 1995 meeting. Thus, the quote "Move Netscape out of Win32" was presumptively relating to the meeting, and corroborates Marc Andreeson's notes and Barksdale's testimony.

You don't even have to be a monopoly to violate the Sherman act by dividing a market. I don't see how Microsoft is going to get out of this one. Unless Microsoft refutes this claim in a very strong way, they've already lost the case.



To: PMS Witch who wrote (11880)10/28/1998 11:47:00 PM
From: ed  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74651
 
Well, most of the what so called evidence provided by DOJ to be against Microsoft
are just fantasy and self explanation. If the judge will judge this case just base on these evidences which were based on imagination , then there is no justice in the American legal system. Just like A told the police that B will kill A, then the police held B as
criminal without any solid evidence. In this analogy, A is NSCP, Sunw, ORCL, and B is Microsoft, and the Judge is the police.