SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Rick Julian who wrote (25684)10/28/1998 1:50:00 PM
From: Sam Ferguson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
"I am hoping someone, anyone, who represents their self as an atheist will proactively and affirmitavely state where they extract philosophical meaning from their existence. Personally, I am not interested in quotes from other thinkers (philosophers, scientists, et al) in this proposed exercise."

Can you start this off with your own? I don't want the words God, bible, preacher, church, elders, body of Christ, christian brotherhood
or bible authorities used.

What an idiotic statement from you. You want to trust someone's opinion who is not qualified to answer your asinine posts. Go back to the ask God thread if you want to promote Christianity.

This is a freethought forum.



To: Rick Julian who wrote (25684)10/28/1998 5:35:00 PM
From: George S. Montgomery  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
Rick, despite the fact that I have terminated colloquy with you, I answer...

You do not see!

Sam has said positives. Del has said positives. Steve has said positives. And I have said positives. (Positives meaning things that we believe to be.)

I believe we are part of an awesome vastness - that we are scrambling to understand.

You believe "we understand."

Can I add "petty" to my list of descriptors of your mental processes? g.



To: Rick Julian who wrote (25684)10/28/1998 5:58:00 PM
From: Dayuhan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
Rick,

To be more pleasant about it...

I believe existence can be wonderful

I believe existence can suck

I believe that if more people tried to make it wonderful instead of trying to make it suck (or not trying at all) it might be more fun.

And that's about it. I can speculate about a great deal more, but that is all I really believe.

It's hard to get a statement of creed from an atheist because, like most people with inquiring minds, we tend to be sure of very little.

If I'm in New Jersey and looking at a road that dead-ends in the ocean, I can state with fair certainty that the road in question does not lead to Los Angeles. That does not mean I claim to be able to say which road does lead there.

Clear?

Steve



To: Rick Julian who wrote (25684)10/28/1998 6:10:00 PM
From: Jacques Chitte  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
>state where they extract philosophical meaning from
their existence. Personally, I am not interested in quotes from other thinkers <

OK, I'm confused. If not from others, from where should the atheist extract his philosopy? To me the verb "extract" implies an external source.

There is no atheist scripture. It's a contradiction in terms. This is one of the qualities which makes atheism ... interesting. There isn't some cowl&robe guy to lean over your shoulder and tell you "you're doing it wrong". So - to ask for a statement from some central atheist text or mythos is imho not gonna work.

>To date it has been "Rick
vs. The Atheists"<
This strikes me as unfair. First off, is there a single self-identified atheist here? Second off, it's been more like "Rick and Steve and E and Alex and Sam and...". I don't see any real binary division anywhere - rather a room with many voices comparing (sometimes politely) dearly-held ideas and beliefs.

>This could be a very powerful and transformative exercise. It has the potential to
demonstrate the metapotential of on-line interaction regarding a subject of immense
gravity--the meaning of our existence. E? Anyone?<

You imply that the potential is unrealized. I gently disagree. I do think that once the usual ego stuff is winnowed out, we've done and said some neat things here. But we have to remember how subjective the process is. I listen differently - and I hear something you don't. (And you hear something I don't - and I'll just have to take your word for it.)

The whole thing collapses if we allow ourselves to get indignant.



To: Rick Julian who wrote (25684)10/28/1998 6:28:00 PM
From: E  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
Rick, I think you missed the irony in the Pascal quote.

And I think you've closed your ears when I and others have responded to your prior statements to the effect that atheists are ethically challenged and spiritually impoverished.

I have told you that my personal proposed "rule for living" might be most succinctly summed up by the Golden Rule. As I recall, you replied that "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you" didn't have "teeth" in it, the point evidently being that without greater specificity of rules and an imaginary disciplinarian standing in the wings to enforce them, you felt this precept would be less effectual than the ones you prefer.

To discuss in greater depth my "spirituality" or lack thereof by your definition or any definition might or might not be an interesting exercise, but in any case it would be a change of subject from "Does God Exist Or Is That a Silly Notion Invented Because It Seemed Like a Good Idea At The Time?"

I can spend my life in trying to ameliorate the suffering of those on earth... or in performing acts of cruelty... or in meditative bliss... or in a coma; and not one of those choices of mine, however explicitly I were to explicate it here for you, would have the teeny tiniest itty bitty little thing to do with the truth status of the words "A God Entity Exists Out There."

It is the oft-expressed opinion on the part of credulists that there is a connection between what they call their "spirituality," (a self-description which, I have noticed, many are wont to advertise quite smugly in this vale) and their ethics, that gives Pascal's observation its ironical force.

(Atheists, however good and conscientious and informed by love the lives they lead, are used to being told by those who believe there is a God, and that He most assuredly favors their own sect, that atheists are, somehow, spiritually and morally lacking (and will most likely burn in a simply agonizing hell forever!); so a statement by a religious person about atheists doing evil in any manner at all would lack the ironical flavor of Pascal's bitter observation and would fall on quite jaded ears-- we've heard it all before from those who think religiosity equates to virtue and decency! in my case, starting in my early childhood while the sons and daughters of the Christian families in the neighborhood were punching my lights out. (And don't even think about the childhood little "Joey the Jew, Joey the Jew" was treated to.)

My position is that there is no causal connection whatever between self-proclaimed "spirituality" and human decency. None. Zero. Zilch. And since what I value is human decency, I look askance, or at least with ennui, at spiritual flag waving.

Here's a link to a fascinating and chilling post Tom Simpson called to our attention.

Message 6141813

and here are a few lines excerpted from it with three words of its spiritual fulfillment- valuing author bolded (Pascal would have nodded in unsurprise):

"....of that the majority would be
European, Japanese, American - high-tech, highly
urbanized, with huge depopulated wilderness
areas for exploration, recreation, and spiritual
fulfillment.
The rest would be the selected
survivors of the reduced civilizations..."

I'd suggest that for an interesting exchange you run this guy down and ask him to dialogue with you about his spirituality. I have nothing to say about mine or anyone else's, because what one declares about that subject has nothing whatever to do with whether one is a fine human being or a vile one.



To: Rick Julian who wrote (25684)10/29/1998 2:02:00 AM
From: Krowbar  Respond to of 108807
 
Rick, As an Atheist I believe that...

There are no certainties, only degrees of probability.

The best knowledge is obtained using the scientific method.

Dogma is to be viewed with suspicion.

The Earth has been in existence for about 5 Billion years.

Humans have evolved from lower life forms.

There is probably no afterlife.

God was created by man, in his image, and with all of his faults.

I will be judged in this life by my peers.

I will treat others as I wish to be treated.

I should try to leave this Earth better than I found it for future generations.

I will respect the creatures of this Earth, except mosquitos.

My personal philosophy is derived from observing nature and reflecting on the ideas of others.

I will not coerce others to believe as I do, and will do my best to disrupt the efforts of those who would use coercion to force others to believe as they do.

These are just some of my personal beliefs and do not necessarily reflect the beliefs of other Atheists.

Del