Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Don't Ask Rambi -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rambi who wrote (14110)	10/30/1998 2:22:00 PM
From: Thomas C. White	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 71178

[flipflipflipflip..] Oh, come now my dear penni. This is so slightly disingenuous of you. A less than clever forgery that can easily be foiled by the most cursory examination. Third Addendum, page 3,092, Section 3.b second paragraph. To whit: "The party of the first part [love slave] shall lose his appendages at the sole behest of the party of the second part [mistress]." [emphasis added]. Now. It happens that I was careful enough to surreptitiously make a copy of this document, despite my inebriated condition at the time of initialing. You will clearly see in my copy: "The party of the first part [love slave] shall lose his escargots privileges at the sole behest of the party of the second part [mistress]." [emphasis added]. And in fact, if we hold your copy up to the light -- why, bless my soul! There it is! Under the white-out! "Escargots privileges!" Silly penni.