Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: I Am John Galt who wrote (52992)	10/30/1998 9:32:00 AM
From: Just My Opinion	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 55532

Matty: If you were referring to me as a died in the wool yaysayer, you are really off base. I never thought the company had any value, I posted it, and in 100's of private conversations I made this known. If you are referring to me as a died in the wool short squeeze yay, I have posted almost consistenty, (except when I simply forgot) that "if" word, empahsizing that I felt that anything that would happen would be contingent on IF there is a short squeeze. Now you can read anthing you want into my intent, but intent was simply to partake in a short squeeze, IF it happened, I made no bones about..I would have loved to make money on the situation, I didn't give a crap if the company was worth anything, and I would do it today, and tomorrow and next week, if the opportunity presented itself. If anybody on this planet disapproves of that..well like we used to say in the army.."tell it to the chaplain". I had owned the stock, hoped that riley was right, had to sell, I already explained the reason), and never got back in. I would have jumped on this stock in minute if I saw and felt for sure that the "squeeeze" was going. I make no apoplogies for my posts, my attitude, my actions, my insults, and I really don't care what anybody thinks about how I behave. Have I left anything out? If I have..then I will be glad to fill in the blanks. I tried to argue against the things that I felt were untrue (by the nays) but if you notice, I don't think that I ever argued for THE COMPANY..except maybe in jest..which any semi literate person would have been able to differentiate between serious postings and (what I considered anyway) hunorous oes. I wil leave the jr detective work to s martin and paul "culo" casulo to find the ones where they think I have done wrong. I have insisted that if people truely believe there is anything amiss in my trading history, or postings just cut the middleman out and send them all to the SEC. I believe that you on the other hand..really may have a problem, if in fact the pumping and dumping idea is illegal. You have already admitted you did that on these boards. You have some very questionable posts concerning this matter, why don't the siamese twin jr detective brothers go find some of them, and you will see what you have said. This stock is halted, it may never trade again, but as long as it doesn't go chapter 7 there is always hope for these people, however slim. You may feel that the above statement is hype, but I am willing to bet serious money that it is nothing more that a truthful statement by any measure other than some silly ass's trying to twist it.