Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (11762)	10/30/1998 11:16:00 AM
From: Bill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

<<Having denied the public threat, would you care to deny the private threat also?>> No denial necessary. Only a thin skinned coward would be frightened by someone admonishing him for his childish behavior. Here are my dreaded PMs to you for all to see what a terrible threat I am. To: Daniel Schuh (who wrote...) From: Bill Vaughn Thursday, Oct 29 1998 10:43AM ET If you start down that path of direct name calling, it will have a bad ending my friend. To: Daniel Schuh (who wrote...) From: Bill Vaughn Thursday, Oct 29 1998 11:28AM ET I just did a search on "liar". Haven't found even one instance where I directly called you one. Found several where I pointed out your action, the LIE. But not direct name calling. I find that offensive and so does SI. So, knock it off. Keep it at a little higher level. > So there you have it. What do you think, can we keep it at a higher level?