Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: CDMQ who wrote (67653)	10/31/1998 12:17:00 AM
From: Paul Engel	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

CDMQ - Thanks for that eloquent article regarding the FTC suit against Intel. The other - and more important - side to this suit is that NO COMPETITORS are involved. The three companies in dispute with Intel were INTEL CUSTOMERS. Paul

To: CDMQ who wrote (67653)	10/31/1998 12:59:00 AM
From: TTOSBT	Respond to of 186894

Re: "All: I'm very long on INTC and scared! microsoft.aynrand.org Best to all," Sheehs! Do I detect a pattern here? Am I wrong in surmising that when the economy or market conditions are scary and worrisome that the word or brief or understanding among investors is 'Intel will do better when these conditions go away'. And then the minute the conditions go away the word or brief or understanding among investors becomes 'Intel is a monopoly and FTC will pair them down' or 'Intel's competition is gaining and they are no longer the dominant force in the chip industry' etc add infinitum! Am I astray in thinking there is seemingly a conspiracy to keep this stock from rising? And if so why? God is there no fairness anymore even in logic? TTOSBT

To: CDMQ who wrote (67653)	10/31/1998 1:17:00 AM
From: nihil	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

RE: Scared "Stocks will fluctuate." "Sell to the sleeping point." -- J.P. Morgan (1837-1913)

To: CDMQ who wrote (67653)	10/31/1998 10:19:00 AM
From: Regeloney	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Great article. Ann Rand Institute. Atlas Shrugged. Wow! Clintonesque: All for one (government is big mama) and none for all (no one has to be at work or competitive or earn money to survive).