Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pezz who wrote (11929)	10/31/1998 8:18:00 PM
From: Who, me?	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Wait a minute! All the seats in the House are up for grabs every 2 years! So if the Republicans pick up seats in the House every election, eventually the Dems would be gone<g>. My point was the fact that the Dems are saying the Republicans are not doing so well. Well, when you pick up 1 more than your opponent, it's winning, as best as I can count! Most think the Republicans will pick up more than 7 seats in the House, 2 or more in the Senate and 3 or more Governors. That doesn't take into account the State houses the Republicans have taken over since Clinton came to town. I tell you, Bill Clinton is the best thing that ever happened to the Republican party!!! I'm not responsible for Michelle's actions. More liberal spin! Someone else is to blame. Part of the Republican platform has been personal accountability. I'm accountable for my actions and Michelle is accountable for hers. Maybe you should consider counseling her!!!

To: pezz who wrote (11929)	10/31/1998 8:41:00 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Pezz: talk.techstocks.com JLA

To: pezz who wrote (11929)	11/1/1998 1:45:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Pezz, just for the record, Who,Me would have a difficult time initiating a warning for me from SI. All you have to do is look at her profile to see that most of her posts are inflammatory attacks towards me, and she has a hard time distinguishing between my virilant attacks on entities such as the RR vs personal attacks which do in fact violate the SI terms of use technically (not sure if she really doesnt know the difference or just spins it to her own advantage). In any case she tried to go to the SI police last week regarding me and ended up initiating a warning to herself. To be fair, I was also told to stop arguing with her. So no matter how many times she threatens me it really isnt going to matter in my book - nothing to worry about. Once again, going to the SI police on an opinion thread is extremely childish. I doubt I would ever do it.