Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Marty who wrote (12040)	11/1/1998 2:15:00 PM
From: pezz	Respond to of 67261

Yes pez

To: Marty who wrote (12040)	11/1/1998 2:34:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Yes. You might enjoy visiting the tail end of the moribund "Should Clinton Resign" thread, Marty. In which I had this somewhat surreal dialogue with mrknowitall, arguing that candidates should make their views clear before the election, let the people decide. This was met by a bunch of fog about how unknowable it all was. I'd agree with you to a point, a clear Republican swing in the elections will be taken as a green light for impeachment, regardless of polls on the matter or whether anything beyond bimbogate surfaces. Most candidates appear afraid to address the issue directly, though. My previously stated reading on that problem was to assume party affiliation as a suitable proxy. For the "correct" reading of public opinion on the matter, of course, you have to refer to Leno's ratings as interpreted by Bill Vaughn.