Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cindy Powell who wrote (10337)	11/2/1998 3:22:00 AM
From: Ellen	Respond to of 26163

Wow! What a nice surprise to find your post Cindy. It's nice to see someone else post (publicly) about Janice's behavior. As far as "losing" to Janice, maybe I have and maybe I haven't. <G> Although it was not a "contest" to me, maybe I "won" because by the sheer number of and *@&#^$%-tone of her posts, others see her and her manner for what it truly is. That is worth whatever aggravation was endured along the way. Her research can be quite good, I agree. And, she is intelligent. At one point in time, I posted to her that she could "use" her intelligence better. Unfortunately, it fell on deaf ears. Thank you for your kind words. They are very much appreciated! My regards, Ellen

To: Cindy Powell who wrote (10337)	11/2/1998 5:14:00 AM
From: zonkie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26163

I disagree with everything you said and if you haven't read this thread from the beginning you don't have all of the facts needed to form any opinion. Your passing judgment on Janice makes you look small not her and you obviously don't know much about Ellen or you wouldn't praise her as you have. Just from reading your post I get the opinion that it is another case of jealousy or possibly resentment because she exposed some nefarious stock you were stuck in, much the same as Ellen has been several times. I doubt seriously you can point out any examples of Janice acting the way you describe to normal law abiding people on this thread. If you had read this thread from the start and been aware of all the tricks and lies that the stooges have tried to pull the wool over the eyes of investors with I don't believe you would talk the way you do and if you did I would still disagree with you. I would expect you will get a few nice replies from the stooges for your attempt to besmudge an honest fellow SI poster, but I wouldn't hold my breath expecting anyone that has much sense to agree with you. I will not make one of those cutesy signoffs like "sweet dreams" that seem to me to only be made as a way of insinuating "go screw yourself" because in my opinion only morons do that. I hope for your bank accounts sake that you pick stocks better than you pick people. zonkie.... PS.....I bet your post will make yEllens day.

To: Cindy Powell who wrote (10337)	11/2/1998 6:55:00 AM
From: Dean Dumont	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 26163

Cindy, thank you for posting everything. Zonkie will do his best at being himself, and I do not have to describe what that is, we all know. I am sure that the attacks you will get for attacking their ICON will cause great stress among the masses, but I have to disagree with you on one aspect. They only get HALF the research and who they get it from are people LIKE ANDY MANN and Rick Marcasse and others who are actually or more than likely paying them for their efforts. They deny it for the simple fact is they do not have to disclose it. Which is too bad, because I'd like to also know how someone can spend all day online, searching SI and being the internet vigilante and still pay the bills. I have no knowledge of these peoples financial affairs, and really do not care to, but 20 hours a day online researching and providing information from known individuals who would rather see this company and any other one they are shorting hurt by these types of activities, does make me wonder how they can really credit the materials they receive and then call it fact. Although they would rather attack and break all the SI rules that others have been booted for, because they are protected individuals of SI. Makes one wonder what SI's involvement is with these people as well. BYE ALL, no more posting from me for a while.

To: Cindy Powell who wrote (10337)	11/2/1998 9:07:00 AM
From: Just My Opinion	Respond to of 26163

Cindy: That was a very astute post. However you neglected to include the rest of that gang. They travel in packs, "gang banging" people. I guess they are afraid that they can't cut the mustard alone. They have accused Ellen relentlessly of a silly thing, when all they had to do was use this link, complain to him, and quit whining like a bunch of babies, if they had any real balls, and any real evidence of her wrong doing. Member 3038133 Now, there is no question that they do terrific DD, however if they were so confident of themselves, they would focus on aznt, and leave people alone that really have nothing to do with any sort of scheme that they have attributed to them. This stock is all about a court case nothing more. The company has no value. They do know the particulars of the events, but have not revealed them as far as I know. They want to continue the thread in it's present state, it is a lot of fun for them. They are a bad as anyone they criticize, because of this. Your post was as little harsh, maybe..but the intent was right on, I believe. Ellen has done NOTHING wrong, except in their self righteous eyes.

To: Cindy Powell who wrote (10337)	11/2/1998 9:44:00 AM
From: Janice Shell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26163

Cindy dear-- Many thanks for your charming message. I would, however, recommend that you learn something about this thread and its Players before jumping intemperately into the fray. You could, for example, go back and check out the obscene and threatening emails sent to me by Pugs. You want a real bully? I give you Pugs, in his various incarnations. Or have a look at the misspelled Icabod's delightful series of "cancer" posts, contributed over the weekend. Icky's a sweetheart, too. This is hardly the behavior and character of a supposed art historian. The art professors that I have known and associated with would not think of stooping to your level of communication. You have no idea how really funny that is. Obviously you haven't known very many academics. Once again, though, you should seek to inform yourself before jumping to conclusions. Actually I publish quite a lot, and am well-known in my field. And of course I wouldn't want to disappoint: Cindy misspelled quite a few words. lololololololol wink wink!