To: Jeff R who wrote (19105 ) 11/3/1998 1:00:00 PM From: Technocrat Respond to of 29386
Jeff, You misinterpreted my remarks about Veritas. I never said it was "just" a file system vendor. What I did say was that its primary accomplishment was developing the VERITAS File System. This is a huge achievement. You see, a file system along with its integration with BIOS and BDOS routines typically represents the foundation of an entire operating system. Microsoft is struggling with its NT 5.0 filesystem which has ballooned to over 35 million lines of code (NT 4.0 is reported to be around 5 million lines). So, I would never belittle this back-breaking work. Veritas is just a filesystem vendor as in Intel is just a CPU chip maker. Veritas carved its business by shoring up "weaknesses" in the Unix operating system as regard to filesystems. Recall that Unix came from a research environment and the beauty of its design is the simplicity of the file system. Big businesses used to working with mainframes wanted some of the complexity back in like volume management. Companies like HP, Sun, SGI, and the like shunted those clients to Veritas. Consequently, Veritas has its tentacles inside the heart of many of the top software development staffs of the Unix OEMs. For the last couple of years on this thread, I have made the prediction that before FC could make serious progress with SAN markets, the filesystem vendors would have to incorporate this technology into their software. Hardware could work super fine, but without the software the system does not perform to meet the potential. So, you see, I was emphasizing the significance of Veritas involvement compared to Legato. I'll make another prediction. I suspect the best FC software will come from the Open Sources market. Look for some speed records to show up with Linux running on racks and racks of systems at some ISPs. There is a FC Linux software running right now which has Veritas scratching their head. Kurt