Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Steve Joy who wrote (9116)	11/3/1998 7:50:00 PM
From: Sam	Respond to of 26850

FYI... I look forward to TeeVee' posts they are very informative ,super was a little out of line and we should except his explanation and forget it I wonder when we can hear from Walt again to see if he can add any light to this tonnage , If every thing is in place we should be hearing about the core samples this week sam

To: Steve Joy who wrote (9116)	11/3/1998 9:19:00 PM
From: maintenance	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 26850

Teevee's comments interested me. I did some research into cone sheets, everything teevee said can be corroborated elsewhere. Only one snag, cone sheets have never been associated with kimberlite, but rather eruptive events, containing other material. That doesn't mean it can't happen with kimberlite, only that to date such a thing has not been found. One thing I found interesting was the reference to clay in cone sheets, is this the green clay? I'm not a geologist and I will stick to my current valuation of about $6.00 for now. My area is finance. Keep us posted teevee, thanks Cheers

To: Steve Joy who wrote (9116)	11/3/1998 11:42:00 PM
From: Chad Barrett	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26850

<< do you guys really think it is possible to see 80 million tonnes? >> Nope. Definitely not if it is just the dyke. Possibly if they find the pipe? Although teevee's math may be correct for the assumptions he made, the drilling certainly hasn't tested the entire circular 2.5km radius cone dyke structure he refers too... not even close... so the odds of all of his assumptions falling into place seems to be small. Having said that, even 10 million tons of dyke with the grades we have seen would be GREAT! Anything above that (up to the "theoretical" 80 million tons) would just give even more value to the stock. A pipe would result in a bonanza! I don't even want to think what the trading would be like if that happened! Actually..... I DO want to think of what that trading would be like... Big A#@ Grin Chad