Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Simula (SMU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Noblesse Oblige who wrote (1487)	11/4/1998 10:23:00 AM
From: Jaime H. Ayalde	Respond to of 1671

"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it." I guess you have forgotten the past, go through what you have been led to believe in 96 -97 -98. Seems you are repeating the past in believing their PR for 99. As for the Law Suit: SMU itself is saying that the suits are unrelated. From the News Wire: In February 1998, Simula sued Autoliv in the United States District Court of Arizona in a case arising out of different facts. In that unrelated lawsuit, Simula alleged certain anti-competitive acts and practices by Autoliv. That litigation is pending. For someone that has never owned SMU, buying some at 5 -6 could be a great "speculation". Price reflects professional opinion of facts as they are known. I would not use follow. It does take a series of disappointments to move a share value from 24 to 5. Price level does not change these disappointments. Have a good one. J