Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Ben Ezra Weinstein (BNEZ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Leroyt who wrote (4352)	11/4/1998 2:43:00 PM
From: Elio Madama	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9391

I bought few shares today, 10.000 in 5 trades. Each time right after my trade, it was a SELL more than double of my very poor buys. WE HAVE PROBLEMS. STRONG ENEMIES WITH $$$$$$$$$$$$$ Elio

To: Leroyt who wrote (4352)	11/4/1998 9:24:00 PM
From: Ellen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9391

4. The judge may still issue a summary judgement which means that the judge does not think that BNEZ has a case and it's not worth wasting the court's time. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't it AOL that asked for a summary judgement? In other words, they asked for it thinking the judge would easily or quickly award it as AOL felt the CDA would "protect" them. ? The fact that the judge said "no" right now to AOL's request and awarded the limited discovery to BNEZ says he thinks there is more it (being a content provider) than that with AOL in this case. Sounds to me like BNEZ's lawyers showed enough about how AOL "shows" or relays quotes to warrant the discovery. So I do not get the impression at all that the judge "does not think that BNEZ has a case". Seems he thinks there may be more it and is allowing the discovery to determine that.