SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Pullin-GS who wrote (18880)11/5/1998 9:08:00 AM
From: Spartex  Respond to of 77397
 
Thanks Pullin, you're comments been bookmarked for future reference.



To: Pullin-GS who wrote (18880)11/5/1998 9:24:00 AM
From: Spartex  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 77397
 
Off-topic

November 02, 1998, Issue: 707
Section: InformationWeek Labs

NDS Offers Stability And Maturity
Logan Harbaugh

Based on our experience with Active Directory Server, organizations with either a mixed Novell-Microsoft
network-or even a Windows NT-only network-may want to consider implementing Novell's NetWare Directory Services instead of, or alongside, Active Directory. My reasons for this are twofold: First, NDS for NT is stable and mature, and NDS on NT will be released soon (it's available in beta now), allowing even NT-only networks to implement NDS. Also, NDS is now in its third generation as an enterprise directory and has well-developed tools for administering enterprise networks, as well as some truly wonderful applications such as ZENWorks, which allows manageable enterprisewide application deployment. It has features not available elsewhere, such as the ability to make any application self-healing. If a user deletes files necessary to run an application, ZENWorks detects this and reinstalls just the needed files.

The second reason is more philosophical. If Active Directory has the same sort of teething pains that NDS did-and there's no reason to assume it won't-the first implementations of Active Directory will be painful. With initial implementations of NDS, the biggest problems were due not to the functionality of the directory itself, but to misunderstandings by administrators of the most effective way to deploy an enterprisewide directory service-and, to a certain degree, to less-than-mature administrative tools.

With NDS, administrators could begin deployment today, rather than in a year or two, figure out the logistical and Practical directory-related issues with a well-established product, get help from numerous other administrators or consultants who have years of experience with NDS, and then have a very simple conversion process to Active Directory, when and if they decide to switch. Even currently available tools from either Microsoft or Novell make this painless, and the process will get easier by the time Active Directory is ready to ship.

However, many administrators may discover that they like the additional applications NDS offers, and since NDS on NT can even handle Active Directory calls, there would be very little reason to switch.



To: Pullin-GS who wrote (18880)11/18/1998 8:50:00 AM
From: Spartex  Respond to of 77397
 
Pullin, FYI.......=;-> Humbly, QuadK

Message 6289960

dailynews.yahoo.com.

Wednesday November 18 3:57 AM ET

Cisco, Novell to collaborate on Novell Directory Services

PC Week

By Scott Berinato, ZDNet

LAS VEGAS -- It's not the deal, but it is a deal.

After months of negotiation, Cisco Systems Inc. and Novell Inc. are expected to announce at Comdex here
Wednesday that they will work together to integrate Novell Directory Services (NDS) with Cisco networking
hardware, according to sources close to the companies.

To underscore the commitment, the companies will demonstrate at Novell's Comdex booth a new technology
that enables NDS to store networking hardware configurations in the directory and automatically distribute those
configurations to any network device by way of a Java applet.

Cisco (Nasdaq:CSCO) will not license NDS as part of the deal, as many users were hoping. But the companies
have agreed that any extensions made for Cisco products in the standard Directory Enabled Networking (DEN)
schema will be made available to Novell (Nasdaq:NOVL) to apply to NDS, sources close to Cisco said. This
will enable NDS to fully manage DEN-enabled Cisco hardware.

Sources said the Novell partnership does not affect Cisco's development of Cisco Networking Services for
Active Directory (CNS/AD), forthcoming software services that are based on Microsoft's directory service,
which is due as part of Windows 2000 next year.

Novell and Cisco have not set a target date for releasing their yet to-be-named technology.



To: Pullin-GS who wrote (18880)12/11/1998 5:42:00 PM
From: Spartex  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 77397
 
The Fabulous Market Babe Stock of the Day

12/07/98

Lucent Technologies / LU

Given the renewed interest in this one as of late, I thought an update was in order.

Not to worry though, this is not going to be a rehash of what was seen and heard at the CSFB conference last week, but will
focus on the future, as opposed to just the here and now.

After all, true understanding of the future direction of a company, especially in technology, is a tad difficult to find these days.

Not to mention that it provides much greater confidence when the market and the group inevitably starts getting the shakes.

But before we start, if you would like a review of past comments on the mighty LU, feel free to take a pick from the CSCO vs.
LU column, the This is Getting Ridiculous column and A Few Reasons to Refocus on Lucent    column.

The key for LU as the telecommunications industry continues to amaze and surprise by the leaps and bounds, is to continue its
focus on the area of photonics.  As such, this column will focus on what photonics is, why the field is important to LU going
forward, as well as what specifically LU is doing to dominate the field.

First off, just clear up any questions you might have with regards to this area, please be aware that photonics is not the marriage
of robotics and photography.

However freaky and therefore massively interesting that combo may be.

That said, a photonics devices is any device that changes, processes or transmits light. A simple example includes lasers that
generate optical signals which, in turn, are transmitted by glass fibers, another photonics component.

So why is all of this significant?

Photonics components are able to move data whether it be voice, audio and/or video faster than electronics devices that are
currently doing the job.

And, for all of you short-attention spans out there (myself included), we know what this means.

Faster service.

In other words, photonics devices enable more data to be pushed through the "pipe" at faster speeds.

So what does this mean for you and I?

Try much faster Internet connections, as well as decreased costs to the consumer to start out with, as the Internet continues to
drive the demand for increased bandwidth, not to mention more information capacity, i.e. optical storage (the ability to store data
optically, such as on a CD or DVD.)

So now let's relate all of this "big picture" stuff specifically to LU.

To sum it all up, LU makes the equipment that makes all of the above happen.

Whether it be components for heavy duty areas such as optical networking (hooking up computers or telephones via optical
fibers), or inventing new optical heads (the component in your CD player which "reads" the data on the disc), LU clearly has its
fingers in almost every pie in this area.

Which, in its own right, is very significant, because if an individual wants to make a bet in this area, the surest way of going
about it is to invest in the company that has a chokehold on the field, as opposed to investing in a company whereby the product
line is centered on one or two optical components.

If only for the reason that LU will more than likely stomp all over them anyway in the long run. 

So, to look a bit into the future, what's the goal here in this industry?

Without a doubt, all optical networks.

Unfortunately though, that's anywhere from 10 - 15 years away.

As such, the stepping stone to the above has been blending optical networks with the current electronically based networks,
otherwise known as optoelectronics, a burgeoning field that will continue to be on the cutting edge for the next 5 - 10 years.

And yes, LU continues to lead the way here as well.

By leaps and bounds no less.

So let's now turn to the next question that is probably on a few of the minds out there.

What about CSCO?

With regards to CSCO, it is simply untrue to state that CSCO does not have an eye on the above as well, as they very much do.
However, LU possesses one overwhelming factor here that CSCO does not.

Bell Labs.

As such, CSCO has a record of continuing to acquire those companies to fill in the gaps in product lines that LU has had for over
100 years.

And the most important aspect in all of this would be...

Acquiring and retaining intelligent, innovative and creative people. As such, it is very important, especially from a timing
standpoint, that CSCO's pace in its foot race with LU not be slowed down due to integration issues with the acquisitions that it
continues to make.

In short, CSCO can ill-afford to have the industry pass them by.

In wrapping this all up, let me make one final point. Within the realm of data networking, it is very important to note that the field
which possesses such overwhelming growth potential both now and far into the future, is able to support not one but two
dominant players, LU and CSCO, as well as a host of smaller companies.

Which says quite a lot, especially when compared  to a company such as MSFT, where its growth in the industry as well as its
ability to stay on top, is determined by an near or total elimination of the competition.

Yes, just a bit more business to go around in networking.