SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : NORE - High Tech Bingo Equipment - Online Bingo -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Silicon Trader who wrote (4581)11/5/1998 3:11:00 PM
From: skreiger  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 7701
 
I can understand the current edginess on this thread -- we finally got the news we had been anticipating (the placement of the Thunderbolt game) and the stock price did not reflect the same enthusiasm. So did we pick a loser? No way!

I personally bought into NRAG because it is 1) a reporting company, 2) IMO, is run by an honest guy, and 3) has a real product which IMO will prove to be something of a cash cow when all is said and done. I'm not even factoring in the work of Jim Gagel and the South American potential. I think my money is well-placed here, especially when I look at some of the other options in the OTC:BB arena.

It is unfortunate some dilution has taken place, but from a fundamental standpoint, little has changed to cause me to question my investment in NRAG. There are plenty of good people on this thread -- people who have been around here a long time. There is a general stability about this whole situation which leads me to believe my long-term outlook will pay off handsomely.

Just my thoughts...



To: Silicon Trader who wrote (4581)11/5/1998 3:16:00 PM
From: Clayton Eley  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 7701
 
Lets see the company does a five to one reverse split and brings the stock price up to $1.00 per share...then issues a millon shares for services...I as a vendor would be more inclined to take stock in company that has a stock price of $1.00 @ 3,000,000 millions shares than a company that has a stock price o $0.20 @ 15,000,000 shares outstanding.

I have seen it done before.