Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

SI - Site Forums : Silicon Investor - Welcome New SI Members! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ViperChick Secret Agent 006.9 who wrote (3305)	11/6/1998 9:56:00 AM
From: SIer formerly known as Joe B.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 32887

w3.mtci.ne.jp

To: ViperChick Secret Agent 006.9 who wrote (3305)	11/7/1998 6:14:00 AM
From: 246810	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 32887

I assume SI spam means this as a measureable postability: * Posting improper or off-topic messages or posting more than twenty messages in six hours. (From ToU) Also, I consider spam to be repetitive touting of an issue's virtues on many threads. SI doesn't control that very well. But as SI admits, they are complaint driven. My opinion is that they (Bob, Jill and whomever) are doing a good job overall. I have had at least one post removed due to a complaint. I don't think anyone using SI for the intended purpose would ever be censured. In fact, some who violate the ToU on the AENG thread are being allowed to slash and burn at each other because the thread originator is just as guilty and the thread has deteriorated to just garbage anyway. The same is true on the WARNING thread. Go with the flow, try a little GHB, relax, the world can't be defined in black and white terms. That's why we have middle management. :) 246810