SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Maurice Winn who wrote (17924)11/6/1998 4:05:00 PM
From: Joe NYC  Respond to of 152472
 
Maurice,

Let's not confuse intra-office LAN and link to Internet. In LAN environment, 100 Mbs is common, Gigabit Ethernet is on the bleeding edge, the "old" technology - standard Ethernet is on it's way out.

I think some people are under impression that the wireless 2Mbs connection will be in similar price range as your 56K modem connection. It will not. It will be costly. It will not be all you can eat deal either. You will pay per byte, and unlimited usage will probably be north of $1,000 per month. (My guess)

At present, my best bet seems to be move house to an optical fibre link or wait for QUALCOMM's WLL to hit town. Meanwhile, my satellite dish has groaned into gear and things are not so slow now.

In the US, there are several technologies being deployed: cable (with copper going to your house), ADSL over standard phone lines. Generally, the prices are in sub-$100 per month including ISP service for unlimited, always on service with transfer rates of 1 to 10 Mbs, more in some cases.

Most people (in the US) already have 2 wires going to their homes (cable and telephone). Wireless will not be competitive with those 2 in any non-mobile configuration for a long time.

Let's be realistic. At present, the only wireless data services in NYC are AT&T CDPD over analog band and some 2 way paging services. All are very low bit rate. There is NO CDMAone data service from main CDMA service providers - Sprint and Bel Atlantic.

Joe



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (17924)11/6/1998 5:40:00 PM
From: Peter J Hudson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
Maurice,

I've been entertained by your rants & vision for a couple of years, which makes it hard for me to believe that you don't see the benefit of 1000Mb/s. How about downloading a just released movie to play on your new HDTV. Receive the whole thing in a few seconds instead of having the satellite dribble bits to your tv or vcr for a couple of hours.



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (17924)11/9/1998 9:58:00 PM
From: Drew Williams  Respond to of 152472
 
Mqurice,

If it's speed you crave, check out

Subject 23602
and
silkroadcorp.com

This company is developing fiber optic technology that will apparantly increase the speed and throughput of fiberoptic networks by orders of magnitude. We're not talking megabytes per second; we're talking terabytes per second.

Zzzzzzzzzzzooooooooooommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.